Corporate Diversity Program :: essays research papers fc

CORPORATE DIVERSITY PROGRAMMy company is one of the leading suppliers and distributors of HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning). We ar a rather large company, with approximately one hundred employees, somewhat diverse, and also quite profitable. Recently, I received a memo stating that a novelty program was to be established. Diversity is certain qualities in other people that are different than your own. It could be age, gender, race, ethnic background, or sexual preference. It even includes income, religion, and education. A diversity program is intended to c innovate on issues surrounding work relationships. It is meant to explore the specialties and uniqueness of diverse individuals. The workplace needs all types of diversity. It is said to make believe a positive effect. We need diversity to become more inventive and open to change. The article Wed Love To Hire Them, But on page 311 of Ores The Social Construction of Difference and Inequality focuses on race and employment. Evidence from studies suggest that expectations on certain groups can strongly influence concern placement. The production of a worker is shaped by relationships with co-workers. Potential and existing employees are not only evaluated by race, but also by their class. This seems to pass off less often, only because class is more difficult to distinguish. It is not easily observed, but detected to employers by ones clothing, educational background, speech, skills, and place of residence. productivity coincides with social relationships. It seems as though behavior, not only job skills, are closely related to effective communications between employees and employers. It has also been suggested that good relations between workers causes higher productivity and increased morale and corporate loyalty.Corporation is defined in the dictionary as an organized body, especially a business, that has been tending(p) a state charter recognizing it as a separate legal entity havin g its own rights, privileges, and liabilities distinct from those of the individuals within the entity. A great deal can acquire assets, enter into contracts, sue or be sued, and pay taxes in its own name. Corporations issue shares of stock to individuals supplying ownership capital and issue bonds to individuals lending money to the business. The corporation is a desirable organization for a business entity for a variety of reasons including the increased capability such an entity has to raise capital. Most large firms, especially those prosecute in manufacturing, are organized as corporations. All stocks sold in the primary market and traded in the secondary market are shares of corporate ownership.

empiricism Essay -- essays research papers

EmpiricismEmpiricism by nature is the belief that there is no companionship without experience. How female genitalia one know what something tastes like if they have neer tasted it? For example, would someone know that an apple is red if they have never actually have seen one. Someone can tell you an apple is red, but, if you never have seen one, can you really be sure?Empiricists use three anchor head teachers in which they derive their opinions from. The first of these points is the plainly source of genuine knowledge is sense experience. An easier commission to understand this is to compare the mind to a clean sponge. As the sponge touches things, it takes with it, a piece of everything it touches. Without this, the sponge would remain clean and be void of anything new(prenominal) than its accept material. With this conclusion, empiricist believes we moldiness be content with the knowledge we have at hand, rather than things we have not yet been privy to. The second ancho r point is Reason is an unreliable and inadequate route to knowledge unless it is grounded in the solid bedrock of sense experience. Empiricists believe that all of our words meanings are derived from our experiences. Everything can be traced back to a single moment in our lives. Empiricists understand that causality is necessary in helping us make our experience intelligible, but reason alone cannot provide knowledge.The third anchor point is there is no evidence of innate Ideas within the mind that are known apart from experience. What this marrow is the mind does not possess ideas that are not backed by experience. In no case are there a priori truths that can some(prenominal) tell about the world and are known apart from experience.When asked the three epistemological questions the three empiricists all have different answers. The first of these questions is is knowledge contingent? John Locke (1632-1704) states Knowledge, however, is not something lying out there in the gra ss it is located in our minds. So to understand knowledge we have to analyze the limit of our minds and see what they tell us about the world (pg. 93). Locke believes that all of our known truths are made up of simple ideas. Simple ideas are what make up the rudimental elements of everything else we know to be true to us today. For example, they consist of ideas such, hot and cold, soft and hard, bitter and sweet. They also give us experience through are own mental o... ...s not possible for our knowledge to truly represent what humanity really is. He believes that the only certainty that we can have concerns the relationships of our own ideas. Since these judgments only concern the realm of ideas, they do not tell us about the external world (p. 108). This means that any knowledge about reality must be based on a posteriori judgments. These judgments are made by Hume because he believes there is no way to have a true reality through knowledge because you only gain knowledge thro ugh experience. In conclusion, Hume states that many empiricists discovered that reality is an impossible goal to understand.Overall, Empiricists believe that there is no knowledge without experience. While their individual views may differ, their fundamental ideas are used to make conclusions about theories in the world. Each of these men have ideas about how knowledge is used and what it creates for each person. Through each of these theories it is apparent that knowledge and reality are difficult to access in such a complicated world. ReferencesLawhead, William F., The philosophic Journey An Interactive Approach, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2003.

The Character of Rev. Arthur Dimmesdale in Nathaniel Hawthornes Scarle

The Character of Dimmesdale in The crimson Letter Nathaniel Hawthornes The carmine Letter, provides us with intricate characters to analyze and evaluate. Hawthorne carefully constructs his characters, giving them each different emotions, values, physical attributes, and thusly creating different souls. One sees character using throughout the book, until at the end, integrity is left with an image of a seemingly real person. One of Hawthornes carefully constructed characters is, Arthur Dimmesdale. With Arthur, one sees how sin changes him dramatically, causing in him clean conflicts. Dimmesdale is continually trying to see who he is. In the beginning of Hawthornes novel, we are introduced to Hester Prynne, who has been condemned for adultery. Through this sin, she has a child named Pearl. The large controversy though, is who is Hesters partner in crime. precisely for seven years, Hester does not reveal it to anyone, not even her husband, Roger Prynne, who comes to town the day she is brought up on the scaffold. Prynne is not riant about respecting his wife convicted of universe an adulteress. He feels that the other guilty party should be up on the scaffold with her. His deep want to find the guilty party, leads him to disguise his identity, and he becomes, Roger Chillingworth. Hester agrees to notice his secret. The novel takes us through the seven years that Hester keeps quiet. A reader of the novel finds out early that Arthur Dimmesdale is the gentlemans gentleman Hester is trying to protect. One notices, that even in the beginning, there is deep inner conflict affecting Dimmesdale.... ...ter of Dimmesdale is excellently constructed through the actions and words that Hawthorne writes. Works Cited and Consulted Brodhead, Richard H., advanced and older Tales The Scarlet Letter, Modern Critical Views Nathaniel Hawthorne, New York, Chelsea House Publishers, 1986. Dibble, Terry J., Cliff Notes on The Scarlet Letter, Linco ln, Cliff Notes, Inc., 1988. Fogle, Richard Harter, The Scarlet Letter, Hawthornes Fiction The Light and The Dark, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1975. Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. New York St. Martins, 1991. Matthiessen, F.O., The Scarlet Letter, Critics on Hawthorne, Readings in Literary Criticism 16, Coral Gables, University of Miami Press, 1972. Matthiessen, F.O., Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Scarlet Letter, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Halls Inc., 1968. The Character of Rev. Arthur Dimmesdale in Nathaniel Hawthornes ScarleThe Character of Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, provides us with intricate characters to analyze and evaluate. Hawthorne carefully constructs his characters, giving them each different emotions, values, physical attributes, and thus creating different souls. One sees character development throughout the book, until at the end, one is left with an image of a seemingl y real person. One of Hawthornes carefully constructed characters is, Arthur Dimmesdale. With Arthur, one sees how sin changes him dramatically, causing in him moral conflicts. Dimmesdale is continually trying to see who he is. In the beginning of Hawthornes novel, we are introduced to Hester Prynne, who has been condemned for adultery. Through this sin, she has a child named Pearl. The bigger controversy though, is who is Hesters partner in crime. But for seven years, Hester does not reveal it to anyone, not even her husband, Roger Prynne, who comes to town the day she is brought up on the scaffold. Prynne is not happy about finding his wife convicted of being an adulteress. He feels that the other guilty party should be up on the scaffold with her. His deep want to find the guilty party, leads him to disguise his identity, and he becomes, Roger Chillingworth. Hester agrees to keep his secret. The novel takes us through the seven years that Hester keeps quiet. A reader of the novel finds out early that Arthur Dimmesdale is the man Hester is trying to protect. One notices, that even in the beginning, there is deep inner conflict affecting Dimmesdale.... ...ter of Dimmesdale is excellently constructed through the actions and words that Hawthorne writes. Works Cited and Consulted Brodhead, Richard H., New and Old Tales The Scarlet Letter, Modern Critical Views Nathaniel Hawthorne, New York, Chelsea House Publishers, 1986. Dibble, Terry J., Cliff Notes on The Scarlet Letter, Lincoln, Cliff Notes, Inc., 1988. Fogle, Richard Harter, The Scarlet Letter, Hawthornes Fiction The Light and The Dark, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1975. Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. New York St. Martins, 1991. Matthiessen, F.O., The Scarlet Letter, Critics on Hawthorne, Readings in Literary Criticism 16, Coral Gables, University of Miami Press, 1972. Matthiessen, F.O., Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Scarlet Letter, Englewood Cliffs , Prentice-Halls Inc., 1968.